×
Create a new article
Write your page title here:
We currently have 245 articles on The Vault @ The EERIE Files. Type your article name above or click on one of the titles below and start writing!



The Vault @ The EERIE Files

Telepathy: Difference between revisions

No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
{{PhenomenonInfobox
{{PhenomenonInfobox
|name=Telepathy
|name=Telepathy
|type=Psychic ability claim
|type=Parapsychological phenomenon
|field=Parapsychology
|field=Parapsychology
|also_known_as=Thought-transference
|also_known_as=Thought-transference; mental telepathy
|notable_case=The ganzfeld experiments (Maimonides Medical Center, 1970s–present)
|notable_case=J. B. Rhine's Zener card experiments (1930s); the Ganzfeld experiments (1974–present)
|status=Unverified
|status=Unconfirmed
}}
}}


'''Telepathy''' is the claimed direct transfer of thoughts, feelings, or impressions from one living mind to another, without using any recognised sensory channel. The term comes from the Greek ''tele'' ("distant") and ''pathos'' ("feeling"), and was coined in 1882 by classical scholar Frederic W. H. Myers, one of the founders of the Society for Psychical Research — it quickly overtook the earlier term "thought-transference" in general use.
'''Telepathy''' is the purported transfer of thoughts, feelings or information from one mind to another without using any recognised sensory channel.<ref name="etymology">{{cite web |title=Telepathy |url=https://scales.arabpsychology.com/2026/06/14/telepathy-2/ |website=Telepathy (mirror)}}</ref> The term derives from the Greek ''tele'' ("distant") and ''pathos'' ("feeling" or "perception").<ref name="etymology" /> Within [[:Category:Parapsychology|parapsychology]], telepathy is treated as a form of extrasensory perception (ESP), alongside [[Clairvoyance]] and [[Precognition]].<ref>{{cite web |title=Telepathy - New World Encyclopedia |url=https://www.newworldencyclopedia.org/entry/Telepathy |website=New World Encyclopedia}}</ref>


Telepathy is distinguished on The Vault from [[Clairvoyance]] (perceiving information about an object or place rather than another person's mind) and from [[Mediumship]] (communication specifically with the dead).
== History ==


== The ganzfeld experiments ==
The term ''telepathy'' was coined in 1882 by classical scholar Frederic W. H. Myers, a founding member of the Society for Psychical Research (SPR) in London, to describe "communication of any kind from one mind to another, independently of the recognised channels of sense."<ref name="psi-myers">{{cite web |title=Frederic WH Myers |url=https://psi-encyclopedia.spr.ac.uk/articles/frederic-wh-myers/ |website=Psi Encyclopedia}}</ref> The word replaced the earlier "thought-transference" and was coined jointly out of Myers's investigations alongside fellow SPR founders Edmund Gurney, Henry Sidgwick and William F. Barrett.<ref>{{cite web |title=Telepathy |url=https://www.encyclopedia.com/medicine/psychology/psychology-and-psychiatry/telepathy |website=Encyclopedia.com}}</ref> Thought-transference was listed as the first of the newly formed SPR's six founding research subjects, ahead of mesmerism, mediumship and apparitions.<ref>{{cite web |title=The Science Behind Telepathy: Is It Possible? Evidence Weighed |url=https://esovitae.com/science-behind-telepathy-is-it-possible/ |website=EsoVitae}}</ref>
The most sustained and closely studied line of telepathy research is the ''ganzfeld'' technique (German for "whole field"), developed by parapsychologist Charles Honorton at the Maimonides Medical Center in the early 1970s and formally introduced by the American Society for Psychical Research in 1974.


In a typical ganzfeld session, a "receiver" sits in a relaxed, mildly sensory-deprived state — halved ping-pong balls placed over closed eyes with a red light shone on them, and headphones playing white or pink noise — while a separate "sender" in another room concentrates on a randomly selected image or video clip, attempting to mentally transmit it. The receiver describes any impressions out loud during the session, and is afterwards asked to pick the correct target from a small set of options.
One of the earliest documented cases investigated by the SPR involved the Creery sisters, five young women from Buxton, Derbyshire, who from 1880 took part in card- and object-guessing games organised by their father that produced strikingly high success rates, prompting formal investigation.<ref>{{cite web |title=Telepathy |url=https://grokipedia.com/page/Telepathy |website=Grokipedia}}</ref>


Ganzfeld studies have repeatedly reported "hit rates" in the region of 30–33%, against a chance expectation of 25% for a four-option choice — a small but, proponents argue, statistically meaningful effect across dozens of studies and dedicated meta-analyses. Critics, most prominently psychologist [[Ray Hyman]], have argued that the results can be explained by methodological weaknesses such as "sensory leakage" (unintended cues passing between sender and receiver) rather than genuine telepathy, and independent replication under increasingly tightened controls has remained inconsistent.
=== Rhine's card experiments ===


== Scientific perspective ==
In the 1930s, psychologist [[J. B. Rhine]] at Duke University conducted extensive card-guessing experiments using Zener cards — a deck of 25 cards divided among five symbols (circle, cross, wavy lines, square, star).<ref>{{cite web |title=Telepathy: Science, Experiments & Psychic Ability |url=https://db.arabpsychology.com/telepathy-2/ |website=arabpsychology.com}}</ref> A "sender" would concentrate on a randomly drawn card while a "receiver" attempted to guess its symbol; chance performance would average one correct guess in five. Rhine reported above-chance results across hundreds of trials, though scores tended to decline toward chance levels as experimental controls — separating rooms, screening the cards from view — were tightened, a pattern later termed the "decline effect."<ref>{{cite web |title=The Science Behind Telepathy: Is It Possible? Evidence Weighed |url=https://esovitae.com/science-behind-telepathy-is-it-possible/ |website=EsoVitae}}</ref> Rhine came to regard telepathy, clairvoyance and precognition as difficult to reliably distinguish from one another in practice, concluding they might represent a single underlying psychic function manifesting in different ways.<ref>{{cite web |title=Telepathy |url=https://www.newworldencyclopedia.org/entry/telepathy |website=New World Encyclopedia}}</ref>
As with the other subtypes gathered under [[Psychic Ability]], telepathy has not been demonstrated to a standard accepted by mainstream science. The ganzfeld debate in particular is often cited as parapsychology's best case for a small, statistically real effect — and, by critics, as an example of how a modest, hard-to-eliminate methodological flaw can produce a result that looks meaningful without actually reflecting the phenomenon being tested for.
 
=== The Ganzfeld experiments ===
 
Beginning in 1974, psychologist [[Charles Honorton]] developed the ganzfeld ("whole field") technique as a more rigorous approach to telepathy testing, placing a "receiver" in a state of mild sensory deprivation — using halved ping-pong ball eye coverings and white noise — while a "sender" in a separate room concentrated on one of several randomly selected target images.<ref>{{cite web |title=The Ganzfeld Experiment: Testing Telepathy |url=https://transpersonal-psychology.iresearchnet.com/parapsychology-and-the-paranormal/the-ganzfeld-experiment-testing-telepathy/ |website=iResearchNet}}</ref> The receiver would then attempt to identify the target from a small set of decoys; with four targets, chance performance is 25%.
 
Honorton's 1985 review of 28 early ganzfeld studies reported hit rates averaging well above chance.<ref name="esovitae2">{{cite web |title=The Science Behind Telepathy: Is It Possible? Evidence Weighed |url=https://esovitae.com/science-behind-telepathy-is-it-possible/ |website=EsoVitae}}</ref> Psychologist and prominent sceptic Ray Hyman conducted a detailed methodological review of the same 42 early ganzfeld experiments, identifying flaws across 12 distinct categories — six statistical, six procedural, including inadequate randomisation, poor documentation, and the possibility of sensory leakage between the sender's and receiver's rooms.<ref name="wiki-scientific">{{cite web |title=Scientific investigation of telepathy |url=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_investigation_of_telepathy |website=Wikipedia}}</ref> Every one of the 42 studies contained at least one of these flaws, and over half failed to adequately guard against sensory leakage; Honorton ultimately agreed with Hyman that, as a set, the 42 studies could not by themselves support a claim for the existence of psi.<ref name="wiki-scientific" /> The two researchers subsequently issued a joint communiqué establishing agreed methodological standards for future ganzfeld research.<ref>{{cite web |title=K_4_10 — Telepathy Research |url=https://theoriesofanything.com/research/telepathy-research |website=Theories of Anything}}</ref>
 
Later "autoganzfeld" experiments, designed to meet these improved standards, were themselves later criticised by Hyman for still not fully ruling out sensory leakage.<ref name="wiki-scientific" /> Subsequent meta-analyses have reached differing conclusions: a 1999 meta-analysis by Richard Wiseman and Julie Milton, covering ganzfeld studies conducted in laboratories other than Honorton's own, found no statistically significant overall effect.<ref>{{cite web |title=K_4_10 Telepathy Research |url=https://theoriesofanything.com/research/telepathy-research |website=Theories of Anything}}</ref> By contrast, a 2010 meta-analysis by Lance Storm, Patrizio Tressoldi and Lorenzo Di Risio, covering 29 ganzfeld studies conducted between 1997 and 2008, reported a combined hit rate of 32.2% across nearly 1,500 trials — a result the authors described as statistically significant.<ref name="wiki-scientific" />
 
== Scientific reception ==
 
Telepathy experiments have been criticised throughout their history for insufficient controls and poor repeatability, and mainstream science has not accepted telepathy as a demonstrated phenomenon; it is generally regarded by the scientific community as pseudoscience.<ref name="wiki-mirror">{{cite web |title=Telepathy |url=https://scales.arabpsychology.com/2026/06/14/telepathy-2/ |website=Telepathy (mirror)}}</ref> Psychical researcher Eric Dingwall criticised SPR founders Myers and Barrett for approaching their research determined to prove telepathy rather than neutrally assessing whether it existed at all.<ref name="wiki-mirror" /> More broadly, sceptics have pointed to the field's recurring pattern — promising early results that decline or fail to replicate as controls improve — as itself a significant finding about the psychology of belief, even where it does not support telepathy as a real phenomenon.
 
== Relevance to The Vault ==
 
Telepathy sits at the historical and methodological centre of parapsychology as a discipline, and several organisations and researchers already documented in the Vault — including the [[Rhine Research Center]] and [[Princeton Engineering Anomalies Research]] — either originated from or engaged directly with telepathy research of the kind described above.
 
== See also ==


== Related concepts ==
* [[Psychic Ability]], the umbrella page for this and related claimed abilities
* [[Clairvoyance]] and [[Mediumship]], the two other subtypes documented so far
* [[:Category:Parapsychology|Parapsychology]]
* [[:Category:Parapsychology|Parapsychology]]
* [[Clairvoyance]]
* [[Precognition]]
* [[J. B. Rhine]]
* [[Charles Honorton]]
* [[Rhine Research Center]]
* [[Princeton Engineering Anomalies Research]]
* [[Anomalistic Psychology]]
{{VaultBrief
|type=parapsychology
|classification=Parapsychological phenomenon / form of extrasensory perception
|earliest=1880 (Creery sisters investigations); term coined 1882
|modern=1930s Zener card experiments–present; ganzfeld experiments 1974–present
|evidence=Statistically above-chance results reported in some card-guessing and ganzfeld studies; effects have repeatedly declined under tighter controls, and meta-analyses of the same broad body of ganzfeld research have reached conflicting conclusions on significance
|investigations=Society for Psychical Research; J. B. Rhine at Duke University; Charles Honorton; Ray Hyman; Richard Wiseman and Julie Milton; Lance Storm, Patrizio Tressoldi and Lorenzo Di Risio
|assessment=No demonstration of telepathy has been independently replicated to the satisfaction of the wider scientific community; the phenomenon remains widely regarded as pseudoscience, though debate over specific meta-analyses of ganzfeld data continues within parapsychology itself
|status=Unconfirmed
}}
== References ==
{{Reflist}}
== External links ==
* [https://psi-encyclopedia.spr.ac.uk/articles/frederic-wh-myers/ Psi Encyclopedia — Frederic WH Myers]
* [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_investigation_of_telepathy Wikipedia — Scientific investigation of telepathy]


[[Category:Psychic and Tarot]]
[[Category:Parapsychology]]
[[Category:Extrasensory perception]]
[[Category:Society for Psychical Research]]
[[Category:1882 introductions]]

Revision as of 13:30, 31 July 2026

Telepathy
TYPEParapsychological phenomenon
FIELDParapsychology
ALSO KNOWN ASThought-transference; mental telepathy
NOTABLE CASE(S)J. B. Rhine's Zener card experiments (1930s); the Ganzfeld experiments (1974–present)
STATUSUnconfirmed

Telepathy is the purported transfer of thoughts, feelings or information from one mind to another without using any recognised sensory channel.[1] The term derives from the Greek tele ("distant") and pathos ("feeling" or "perception").[1] Within parapsychology, telepathy is treated as a form of extrasensory perception (ESP), alongside Clairvoyance and Precognition.[2]

History

The term telepathy was coined in 1882 by classical scholar Frederic W. H. Myers, a founding member of the Society for Psychical Research (SPR) in London, to describe "communication of any kind from one mind to another, independently of the recognised channels of sense."[3] The word replaced the earlier "thought-transference" and was coined jointly out of Myers's investigations alongside fellow SPR founders Edmund Gurney, Henry Sidgwick and William F. Barrett.[4] Thought-transference was listed as the first of the newly formed SPR's six founding research subjects, ahead of mesmerism, mediumship and apparitions.[5]

One of the earliest documented cases investigated by the SPR involved the Creery sisters, five young women from Buxton, Derbyshire, who from 1880 took part in card- and object-guessing games organised by their father that produced strikingly high success rates, prompting formal investigation.[6]

Rhine's card experiments

In the 1930s, psychologist J. B. Rhine at Duke University conducted extensive card-guessing experiments using Zener cards — a deck of 25 cards divided among five symbols (circle, cross, wavy lines, square, star).[7] A "sender" would concentrate on a randomly drawn card while a "receiver" attempted to guess its symbol; chance performance would average one correct guess in five. Rhine reported above-chance results across hundreds of trials, though scores tended to decline toward chance levels as experimental controls — separating rooms, screening the cards from view — were tightened, a pattern later termed the "decline effect."[8] Rhine came to regard telepathy, clairvoyance and precognition as difficult to reliably distinguish from one another in practice, concluding they might represent a single underlying psychic function manifesting in different ways.[9]

The Ganzfeld experiments

Beginning in 1974, psychologist Charles Honorton developed the ganzfeld ("whole field") technique as a more rigorous approach to telepathy testing, placing a "receiver" in a state of mild sensory deprivation — using halved ping-pong ball eye coverings and white noise — while a "sender" in a separate room concentrated on one of several randomly selected target images.[10] The receiver would then attempt to identify the target from a small set of decoys; with four targets, chance performance is 25%.

Honorton's 1985 review of 28 early ganzfeld studies reported hit rates averaging well above chance.[11] Psychologist and prominent sceptic Ray Hyman conducted a detailed methodological review of the same 42 early ganzfeld experiments, identifying flaws across 12 distinct categories — six statistical, six procedural, including inadequate randomisation, poor documentation, and the possibility of sensory leakage between the sender's and receiver's rooms.[12] Every one of the 42 studies contained at least one of these flaws, and over half failed to adequately guard against sensory leakage; Honorton ultimately agreed with Hyman that, as a set, the 42 studies could not by themselves support a claim for the existence of psi.[12] The two researchers subsequently issued a joint communiqué establishing agreed methodological standards for future ganzfeld research.[13]

Later "autoganzfeld" experiments, designed to meet these improved standards, were themselves later criticised by Hyman for still not fully ruling out sensory leakage.[12] Subsequent meta-analyses have reached differing conclusions: a 1999 meta-analysis by Richard Wiseman and Julie Milton, covering ganzfeld studies conducted in laboratories other than Honorton's own, found no statistically significant overall effect.[14] By contrast, a 2010 meta-analysis by Lance Storm, Patrizio Tressoldi and Lorenzo Di Risio, covering 29 ganzfeld studies conducted between 1997 and 2008, reported a combined hit rate of 32.2% across nearly 1,500 trials — a result the authors described as statistically significant.[12]

Scientific reception

Telepathy experiments have been criticised throughout their history for insufficient controls and poor repeatability, and mainstream science has not accepted telepathy as a demonstrated phenomenon; it is generally regarded by the scientific community as pseudoscience.[15] Psychical researcher Eric Dingwall criticised SPR founders Myers and Barrett for approaching their research determined to prove telepathy rather than neutrally assessing whether it existed at all.[15] More broadly, sceptics have pointed to the field's recurring pattern — promising early results that decline or fail to replicate as controls improve — as itself a significant finding about the psychology of belief, even where it does not support telepathy as a real phenomenon.

Relevance to The Vault

Telepathy sits at the historical and methodological centre of parapsychology as a discipline, and several organisations and researchers already documented in the Vault — including the Rhine Research Center and Princeton Engineering Anomalies Research — either originated from or engaged directly with telepathy research of the kind described above.

See also

VAULT ASSESSMENT
CLASSIFICATION
Parapsychological phenomenon / form of extrasensory perception
EARLIEST REPORT
1880 (Creery sisters investigations); term coined 1882
MODERN REPORTS
1930s Zener card experiments–present; ganzfeld experiments 1974–present
EVIDENCE
Statistically above-chance results reported in some card-guessing and ganzfeld studies; effects have repeatedly declined under tighter controls, and meta-analyses of the same broad body of ganzfeld research have reached conflicting conclusions on significance
INVESTIGATIONS
Society for Psychical Research; J. B. Rhine at Duke University; Charles Honorton; Ray Hyman; Richard Wiseman and Julie Milton; Lance Storm, Patrizio Tressoldi and Lorenzo Di Risio
ASSESSMENT
No demonstration of telepathy has been independently replicated to the satisfaction of the wider scientific community; the phenomenon remains widely regarded as pseudoscience, though debate over specific meta-analyses of ganzfeld data continues within parapsychology itself
STATUS
Unconfirmed

References