×
Create a new article
Write your page title here:
We currently have 245 articles on The Vault @ The EERIE Files. Type your article name above or click on one of the titles below and start writing!



The Vault @ The EERIE Files
Telepathy
TYPEParapsychological phenomenon
FIELDParapsychology
ALSO KNOWN ASThought-transference; mental telepathy
NOTABLE CASE(S)J. B. Rhine's Zener card experiments (1930s); the Ganzfeld experiments (1974–present)
STATUSUnconfirmed

Telepathy is the purported transfer of thoughts, feelings or information from one mind to another without using any recognised sensory channel.[1] The term derives from the Greek tele ("distant") and pathos ("feeling" or "perception").[1] Within parapsychology, telepathy is treated as a form of extrasensory perception (ESP), alongside Clairvoyance and Precognition.[2]

History

The term telepathy was coined in 1882 by classical scholar Frederic W. H. Myers, a founding member of the Society for Psychical Research (SPR) in London, to describe "communication of any kind from one mind to another, independently of the recognised channels of sense."[3] The word replaced the earlier "thought-transference" and was coined jointly out of Myers's investigations alongside fellow SPR founders Edmund Gurney, Henry Sidgwick and William F. Barrett.[4] Thought-transference was listed as the first of the newly formed SPR's six founding research subjects, ahead of mesmerism, mediumship and apparitions.[5]

One of the earliest documented cases investigated by the SPR involved the Creery sisters, five young women from Buxton, Derbyshire, who from 1880 took part in card- and object-guessing games organised by their father that produced strikingly high success rates, prompting formal investigation.[6]

Rhine's card experiments

In the 1930s, psychologist J. B. Rhine at Duke University conducted extensive card-guessing experiments using Zener cards — a deck of 25 cards divided among five symbols (circle, cross, wavy lines, square, star).[7] A "sender" would concentrate on a randomly drawn card while a "receiver" attempted to guess its symbol; chance performance would average one correct guess in five. Rhine reported above-chance results across hundreds of trials, though scores tended to decline toward chance levels as experimental controls — separating rooms, screening the cards from view — were tightened, a pattern later termed the "decline effect."[8] Rhine came to regard telepathy, clairvoyance and precognition as difficult to reliably distinguish from one another in practice, concluding they might represent a single underlying psychic function manifesting in different ways.[9]

The Ganzfeld experiments

Beginning in 1974, psychologist Charles Honorton developed the ganzfeld ("whole field") technique as a more rigorous approach to telepathy testing, placing a "receiver" in a state of mild sensory deprivation — using halved ping-pong ball eye coverings and white noise — while a "sender" in a separate room concentrated on one of several randomly selected target images.[10] The receiver would then attempt to identify the target from a small set of decoys; with four targets, chance performance is 25%.

Honorton's 1985 review of 28 early ganzfeld studies reported hit rates averaging well above chance.[11] Psychologist and prominent sceptic Ray Hyman conducted a detailed methodological review of the same 42 early ganzfeld experiments, identifying flaws across 12 distinct categories — six statistical, six procedural, including inadequate randomisation, poor documentation, and the possibility of sensory leakage between the sender's and receiver's rooms.[12] Every one of the 42 studies contained at least one of these flaws, and over half failed to adequately guard against sensory leakage; Honorton ultimately agreed with Hyman that, as a set, the 42 studies could not by themselves support a claim for the existence of psi.[12] The two researchers subsequently issued a joint communiqué establishing agreed methodological standards for future ganzfeld research.[13]

Later "autoganzfeld" experiments, designed to meet these improved standards, were themselves later criticised by Hyman for still not fully ruling out sensory leakage.[12] Subsequent meta-analyses have reached differing conclusions: a 1999 meta-analysis by Richard Wiseman and Julie Milton, covering ganzfeld studies conducted in laboratories other than Honorton's own, found no statistically significant overall effect.[14] By contrast, a 2010 meta-analysis by Lance Storm, Patrizio Tressoldi and Lorenzo Di Risio, covering 29 ganzfeld studies conducted between 1997 and 2008, reported a combined hit rate of 32.2% across nearly 1,500 trials — a result the authors described as statistically significant.[12]

Scientific reception

Telepathy experiments have been criticised throughout their history for insufficient controls and poor repeatability, and mainstream science has not accepted telepathy as a demonstrated phenomenon; it is generally regarded by the scientific community as pseudoscience.[15] Psychical researcher Eric Dingwall criticised SPR founders Myers and Barrett for approaching their research determined to prove telepathy rather than neutrally assessing whether it existed at all.[15] More broadly, sceptics have pointed to the field's recurring pattern — promising early results that decline or fail to replicate as controls improve — as itself a significant finding about the psychology of belief, even where it does not support telepathy as a real phenomenon.

Relevance to The Vault

Telepathy sits at the historical and methodological centre of parapsychology as a discipline, and several organisations and researchers already documented in the Vault — including the Rhine Research Center and Princeton Engineering Anomalies Research — either originated from or engaged directly with telepathy research of the kind described above.

See also

VAULT ASSESSMENT
CLASSIFICATION
Parapsychological phenomenon / form of extrasensory perception
EARLIEST REPORT
1880 (Creery sisters investigations); term coined 1882
MODERN REPORTS
1930s Zener card experiments–present; ganzfeld experiments 1974–present
EVIDENCE
Statistically above-chance results reported in some card-guessing and ganzfeld studies; effects have repeatedly declined under tighter controls, and meta-analyses of the same broad body of ganzfeld research have reached conflicting conclusions on significance
INVESTIGATIONS
Society for Psychical Research; J. B. Rhine at Duke University; Charles Honorton; Ray Hyman; Richard Wiseman and Julie Milton; Lance Storm, Patrizio Tressoldi and Lorenzo Di Risio
ASSESSMENT
No demonstration of telepathy has been independently replicated to the satisfaction of the wider scientific community; the phenomenon remains widely regarded as pseudoscience, though debate over specific meta-analyses of ganzfeld data continues within parapsychology itself
STATUS
Unconfirmed

References